Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Wicked Challenges ™
Filter by Specialism
You're at story 
of the stories connected to
You're at story 
of the stories connected to


In a recent Change Management Institute event, the fascinating influence of biases on decision-making was highlighted, particularly how they can stifle innovation within organisations. Drawing on concepts from Daniel Kahneman's "Thinking, Fast and Slow," the discussion illuminated our tendency to rely on instinctive 'chimp brain' responses and misfiring heuristics, which often lead us down suboptimal paths.

What's on your pad?

Tell us your challenge

Tom's presentation illuminated how biases subtly influence our decision-making, often without us even realising. He introduced the concept using insights from Daniel Kahneman's "Thinking, Fast and Slow", highlighting our 'chimp brain,' which operates on quick, instinctive thought processes rather than logical reasoning. This perspective is crucial for understanding why we might favor certain ideas or reject others prematurely during the innovation process.

Tom also discussed the "Einstellung effect," a cognitive trap where previous problem-solving experiences can limit our thinking and prevent optimal solutions. This effect shows how our brains tend to reuse old solutions, even when they might not be the best fit for new challenges. Such biases are not only fascinating from a psychological standpoint but are critically important in the context of organizational change, where innovative thinking is often necessary.

The presentation further explored how biases could mislead us through 'misfiring heuristics'. This term refers to cognitive shortcuts that are meant to aid quick decision-making but can sometimes lead us astray, especially when compounded by groupthink. This phenomenon is particularly troubling in collaborative environments where the collective mindset might inhibit novel ideas or critical analysis.

Unraveling Biases in Change Management

From the discussions, three key takeaways emerged on how to manage and mitigate biases in a professional setting. First, awareness is crucial. By understanding the nature and effects of biases, individuals and teams can better recognize when they might be influencing decisions unduly. Second, there is the strategy of encouraging positive biases—or cognitive biases that can have beneficial effects, like fostering a more optimistic outlook on potential outcomes.

Lastly, establishing a robust feedback mechanism is essential. This involves creating an environment where it is safe to challenge prevailing opinions or express concerns, possibly anonymously. Such openness not only counteracts negative biases but also enriches the decision-making process, ensuring a broader range of perspectives are considered.

Biases in change management are a deep and intriguing area that requires ongoing dialogue and examination. As we continue to explore and understand the subtle ways in which our minds work, we can better navigate the complexities of organizational change, ensuring more effective and inclusive outcomes.